The Challenge
Binary frameworks like "permanent" vs "non-permanent" or “nature-based” vs “engineered” are hindering the strategic deployment of diverse removal approaches.
Missed Opportunities
-
Achieving net-zero will require every carbon removal tool available. Understanding what to develop, where, and for what purpose is the central strategic question. Quantifying and monitoring risks to carbon stock flows is how we answer it.
-
A portfolio is only as good as the risk framework underlying it. Diversification manages risk, but only if risks are independent, and it cannot guarantee permanence. Climate effectiveness requires both: understanding which risks move together across pathways, and where one storage horizon ends and another must take over.
-
Regulatory frameworks are only as good as the evidence underlying them. As our understanding of carbon stock flows improves, so should the instruments built on it — from compliance market design to new mechanisms like permanence trusts and sovereign storage guarantees that can monitor and manage carbon storage across climate-relevant timescales.
The CaR Framework
Inspired by Value at Risk in financial markets, Carbon at Risk (CaR) quantifies the full distribution of likely carbon storage outcomes — from best to worst case — across the time horizons over which permanence claims actually operate.
Rather than a single deduction based on average expected loss, CaR models the risk factors affecting carbon storage across multiple time horizons — producing a trajectory that reveals not just how much carbon is likely to remain stored, but when large losses become more probable. Two projects can have identical average outcomes but very different probabilities of rare, sudden, severe losses — and when the credits underpinning a net-zero commitment share the same risk factors, those losses can arrive simultaneously. Understanding both the probability and the correlation structure is what enables more accurate risk pricing and better-sized reserves.
This applies across pathways — from reforestation to direct air capture — enabling like-for-like comparison, better risk management, and the forward planning needed to ensure that credits and capital are in place before losses arrive, not after. It is the foundation for understanding and protecting the carbon we remove and the systems that hold it.
Core Components
01 Baseline Assessment
How much carbon was actually removed? Accounting for project emissions, counterfactual baselines, and leakage before permanence can be assessed.
02 Storage Risk Evaluation
How does the storage security change over time? What are the best and worst case scenarios, how likely are they to occur and what is the best way to manage them?
03 Correlation analysis
Do risks move together or separately? How does the global portfolio respond to different climate shocks. How can we track changes in total carbon stocks over time?
Ecosystem Benefits